Categories

Showing posts with label meta-poetry. Show all posts
Showing posts with label meta-poetry. Show all posts

Monday, September 30, 2013

ModPo 2013 #21 What Poetry Depends Upon: On Williams' "The Red Wheel Barrow"

Image from
girlsjustwannareadbooks.blogspot.com.


The Red Wheelbarrow

by William Carlos Williams 

so much depends 
upon 

a red wheel 
barrow 

glazed with rain 
water 

beside the white 
chickens.
------------------------------------

Once again, I'm glad to have watched the video discussion. So much depends upon the phrase "So much depends/ upon!" I would have totally missed it!

I loved how the image itself became dependent on the awareness of making something new, the meta-poetic. It could easily have stood as a crisp imagist poem but the first two lines draw attention to themselves. Are they superfluous? Why does so much depend upon a red wheel barrow? So much of art depends upon something, the lenses that detect the picture, the artist from whose perspective we see the red wheel barrow. 

This brings me to the beauty of language. There is never really just one way to look at things. As Wallace Stevens points out: there are at least thirteen ways to see a blackbird. A red wheel barrow is not just a red wheel barrow, not just the one glazed with rain water contrasted beside the white chickens. So much depends on the speaker, so much depends on the reader. The red wheel barrow is the pastoral life. The red wheel barrow is what is left of the pastoral life. The red wheel barrow shines with rain water because the rain water makes all things new. The red wheel barrow is the speaker and the reader. Or the reader and the speaker are the white chickens. And without the red wheel barrow the speaker and reader do not come into view. 

It's amazing how much can come out of a few photographic lines. Poetry depends upon traditions and innovations.  It makes me want to review all my poems and see how innovative I have been or how inarticulate or unaware I really am about the sources of my poetry. 

Tuesday, September 24, 2013

ModPo 2013 #14 Orphium Frutescens and the exotic, on Doolittle's "Sea Rose"

Note: I am currently taking a course on Coursera.org called Modern and Contemporary American Poetry taught by Al Filreis of the University of Pennsylvania. I will be posting my thoughts on the course discussions here.
Image from strangewonderfulthings.com

Sea Rose
BY H. D.

Rose, harsh rose,
marred and with stint of petals,
meagre flower, thin,
sparse of leaf,

more precious
than a wet rose
single on a stem—
you are caught in the drift.

Stunted, with small leaf,
you are flung on the sand,
you are lifted
in the crisp sand
that drives in the wind.
Can the spice-rose
drip such acrid fragrance
hardened in a leaf?

----------------------------

Here I am on week 3! I really enjoyed the video discussion on Sea Rose. Twenty-two minutes on the sparse rose by H.D! I liked the contrast with the American Beauty rose. I especially loved that last line from the video on the "bullshit analogies between the social/ economic and nature" springing from the famous Rockefeller quote on beauty created out of sacrifice. 

With the rise of imagism, there is a direct rejection of the conventional metaphors, all that are taken for granted. It is easy to bring up a rose and it automatically creates an association with beauty, delicacy, love. Even today, that is evident (flower shops still make tons of money on Valentine's day even here in the Philippines). 

My question, though, deals with how one destruction of metaphor brings up a new metaphor (that will probably need destroying later on!). By turning the tables on the conventional American Beauty rose, H.D. praises the Sea Rose as it is: its hardiness, its sparseness, its acrid (vs. the savory and sweet) fragrance. What one doesn't automatically get is that the Sea Rose is actually a rare breed. While it is hardy and can survive on the shores of coastal South Africa, it is considered an exotic plant. Taken out of its natural environment, a Sea Rose will not survive without manual (and careful) intervention since it doesn't pollinate without the buzzing of the African carpenter bee. Neither will it survive in warmer climates (anything above 20 degrees centigrade). 

By rejecting the American Beauty rose, H.D. raises up the supposedly lowly Sea Rose and with it, exoticism. "Stunted, sparse of leaf, flung on the sand," in contrast with the lush and sweet-smelling roses of convention, what H.D. fails to mention is that the Sea Rose is hard to come by. Given this, it really is a metaphor of the imagism of H.D.'s time, something that is still emerging and definitely not commonplace.

Does this mean, like Dickinson ahead of her, that H.D. is pushing for the rare, the effortful, the difficult, thus isolating poetry from the common man? 

Seen from a 2013 lens, I also see the Sea Rose as a metaphor for beauty (and poetry--using meta language) that is rooted in its native shores. It is not "cultured," it is not an exotic that is put on a pedestal to be gawked at. The Sea Rose thrives in its environment. Even if it is harsh, sparse, acrid, it does what it does without being ornamental. It survives.

Note: I am currently taking a course on Coursera.org called Modern and Contemporary American Poetry taught by Al Filreis of the University of Pennsylvania. I will be posting my thoughts on the course discussions here.

Monday, January 11, 2010

The Pauper, The Prince and The Poet


By Justine C. Tajonera

"Whosoever is delighted in solitude is either a wild beast or a god." - Francis Bacon



If poverty meant solitude
and solitude meant
beast-like or
god-like
existence,
then the poet
would be a
pauper.

If abundance meant solitude
and solitude meant
beast-like or
god-like
existence,
then the poet
would be a
prince.

Or are there three
people in this story:
the pauper, the prince and
the poet?

For to be a poet,
would it not mean that
he is both pauper
and prince?

Does the weight of a leaf
and the grief
it signifies
have anything to do
with the observer's
pocket?

What would afford
a poet her
vision?

Would it be the lack
or the glut
of coin?

I turn the question
around and around
in my head:

there is no answer.

There is a word for
pauper, for prince
and for poet.

Each one has a meaning
and each one is
meaningless
if I so
choose.

(Jan. 9, 2010)

Image from http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:The_Prince_and_the_Pauper_1881_p20.jpg

Search This Blog